Monday, 1 April 2019

Advanced Level Essay terms- Definitions

Analyse
Break an issue into its constituent parts. Look in depth at each part using supporting arguments and evidence for and against as well as how these interrelate
to one another.

Assess

Weigh up to what extent something is true. Persuade the reader of your argument by citing relevant research but also remember to point out any flaws and counter-arguments as well. Conclude by stating clearly how far you are in agreement with the original proposition.

Clarify

Literally make something clearer and, where appropriate, simplify it. This could involve, for example, explaining in simpler terms a complex process or theory, or the relationship between two variables.

Comment upon

Pick out the main points on a subject and give your opinion, reinforcing your point of view using logic and reference to relevant evidence, including any wider reading you have done.

Compare

Identify the similarities and differences between two or more phenomena. Say if any of the shared similarities or differences are more important than others. *‘Compare’ and ‘contrast’* will often feature
together in an essay question.
Consider Say what you think and have observed about something. Back up your comments using appropriate evidence from external sources, or your own experience. Include any views which are contrary to your own and how they relate to what you originally thought.

Contrast

Similar to compare but concentrate on the dissimilarities between two or more phenomena, or what sets them apart. Point out any differences which are particularly significant.

Critically evaluate
Give your verdict as to what extent a statement or findings within a piece of research are true, or to what extent you agree with them. Provide evidence taken from a wide range of sources which both agree with and contradict an argument. Come to a final conclusion, basing your decision on what you judge to be the most important factors and justify how you have made your choice.

Define
To give in precise terms the meaning of something. Bring
to attention any problems posed with the definition and different interpretations that may exist.

Demonstrate

Show how, with examples to illustrate.

Describe

Provide a detailed explanation as to how and why something happens.

Discuss

Essentially this is a written debate where you are using your skill at reasoning, backed up by carefully selected evidence to make a case for and against an argument, or point out the advantages and disadvantages of a given context. Remember to arrive at a conclusion.

Elaborate
To give in more detail, provide more information on.

Evaluate

See the explanation for ‘critically evaluate’.

Examine

Look in close detail and establish the key facts and important issues surrounding a
topic. This should be a critical evaluation and you should try and offer reasons as to why the facts and issues you have identified are the most important, as well as explain the different ways they could be construed.

Explain

Clarify a topic by giving a detailed account as to how and why it occurs, or what is meant by the use of this term in a particular context. Your writing should have clarity so that complex procedures or sequences of events can be understood, defining key terms where appropriate, and be substantiated with relevant research.

Explore

Adopt a questioning approach and consider a variety of different viewpoints. Where possible reconcile opposing views by presenting a final line of argument.

Give an account of

Means give a detailed description of something. Not
to be confused with ‘account for’ which asks you not only what, but why something happened.

Identify

Determine what are the key points to be addressed and implications thereof.
Illustrate A similar instruction to ‘explain’ whereby you are asked to show the workings of something, making use of definite examples and statistics if appropriate to add weight to your explanation.

Interpret

Demonstrate your understanding of an issue or
topic. This can be the use of particular terminology by an author, or what the findings from a piece of research suggest to you. In the latter instance, comment on any significant patterns and causal relationships.

Justify

Make a case by providing a body of evidence to support your ideas and points of view. In order to present a balanced argument, consider opinions which may run contrary to your own before stating your conclusion.

Outline

Convey the main points placing emphasis on global structures and interrelationships rather than minute detail.

Review

Look thoroughly into a subject. This should be a critical assessment and not merely descriptive.

Show how

Present, in a logical order, and with reference to relevant evidence the stages and combination of factors that give rise to something.

State

To specify in clear terms the key aspects pertaining to a
topic without being overly descriptive. Refer to evidence and examples where appropriate.

Summarise

Give a condensed version drawing out the main facts and omit superfluous information. Brief or general examples will normally suffice for this kind of
answer.

To what extent

Evokes a similar response to
questions containing ' How far... '. This type of question calls for a thorough assessment of the evidence in presenting your argument. Explore alternative explanations where they exist

1 comment:

  1. UCL was set up in London, at that point the world's biggest city and this was deliberately. UCL's authors took their standards from the logician and law specialist, Jeremy Bentham, that instruction was the best method to change society, and built up a cutting edge college in the Capital city to advance the investigation of the new sciences of the illumination.


    study art Humanity

    ReplyDelete